1. Pham D., Larson L., Yang J.-W. FinFET device junction formation challenges // 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology. Shanghai: IEEE, 2006. P. 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWJT.2006.220864
2. Metrology capabilities and needs for 7 nm and 5 nm logic nodes / B. Bunday, E. Solecky, A. Vaid et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXI. 2017. Vol. 10145. Art. ID: 101450G. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2260870
3. Ionizing radiation damage in 65 nm CMOS technology: Influence of geometry, bias and temperature at ultra-high doses / G. Borghello, E. Lerario, F. Faccio et al. // Microelectronics Reliability. 2021. Vol. 116. Art. No. 114016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2020.114016
4. Gaps analysis for CD metrology beyond the 22 nm node / B. Bunday, Th. A. Germer, V. Vartanian et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVII. 2013. Vol. 8681. Art. ID: 86813B. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012472
5. Герасименко Н., Волоховский А., Запорожан О. Особенности контроля технологии кремниевых наноструктур // Наноиндустрия. 2017. № 5 (76). С. 36–51. https://doi.org/10.22184/1993-8578.2017.76.5.36.51
Gerasimenko N., Volokhovsky A., Zaporozhan O. Features of control of silicon nanostructures technology. Nanoindustriya = Nanoindustry, 2017, no. 5 (76), pp. 36–51. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22184/1993-8578.2017.76.5.36.51
6. Ukraintsev V. A., Baum Ch., Zhang G., Hall C. L. The role of AFM in semiconductor technology development: The 65 nm technology node and beyond // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX. 2005. Vol. 5752. Art. ID: 602758. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.602758
7. Development of a 3D-AFM for true 3D measurements of nanostructures / G. Dai, W. Häßler-Grohne, D. Hüser et al. // Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011. Vol. 22. No. 9. Art. No. 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/22/9/094009
8. Макушин М. В. Скаттерометрия и перспективные полупроводниковые технологии // Электроника: Наука, технология, бизнес. 2021. № 6 (207). С. 44–53. https://doi.org/10.22184/1992-4178.2021.207.6.44.53
Makushin M. Scatterometry and advanced semiconductor technologies. Elektronika: Nauka, tekhnologiya, biznes = Electronics: Science, Technology, Business, 2021, no. 6 (207), pp. 44–53. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22184/1992-4178.2021.207.6.44.53
9. Кузин А. Ю., Марютин В. Н., Календин В. В. Методы и средства измерений линейных размеров в нанометровом диапазоне // Микросистемная техника. 2001. № 4. С. 9–19. EDN HOIBUT.
Kuzin A. Iu., Mariutin V. N., Kalendin V. V. Methods and means of linear sizes dimensions in nanometer range. Mikrosistemnaya tekhnika = Microsystems Engineering, 2001, no. 4, pp. 9–19. (In Russian).
10. Metrology challenges in 3D NAND flash technical development and manufacturing / W. Zhang, J. Xu, S. Wang et al. // J. Microelectron. Manuf. 2020. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33079/jomm.20030102
11. Resist shrink characterization methodology for more accurate CD metrology / M. A. Breton, K. Petrillo, J. Church et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVI. 2022. Vol. PC12053. Art. ID: PC120530C. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2614219
12. Time-dependent electron-beam-induced photoresist shrinkage effects / B. D. Bunday, A. Cordes, C. Hartig et al. // Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS. 2012. Vol. 11. Iss. 2. Art. No. 023007. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.11.2.023007
13. Mechanism of ArF resist-pattern shrinkage in critical-dimension scanning electron microscopy measurement / T. Azuma, K. Chiba, H. Abe et al. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 2004. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. P. 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1643055
14. 193-nm resist: Ultralow voltage CD-SEM performance for sub-130-nm contact hole process / J. E. Ferri, M. Vieira, M. Reybrouck et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVII. 2003. Vol. 5038. Art. ID: 487597. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.487597
15. Sundaram G., Sullivan N. T., Mai T., Ke Ch.-M. Low-impact resist metrology: The use of ultralow voltage for high-accuracy performance // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII. 2004. Vol. 5375. Art. ID: 539221. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.539221
16. Sundaram G., Lee B.-H., Mai T., Sullivan N. T. Minimizing the impact of image icquisition on CD-SEM LER/LWR measurements // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX. 2005. Vol. 5752. Art. ID: 601090. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.601090
17. Experiment and simulation of charging effects in SEM / S. Babin, S. Borisov, Y. Miyano et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII. 2008. Vol. 6922. Art. ID: 692219. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.772255
18. Novel three dimensional (3D) CD-SEM profile measurements / W. Ito, B. Bunday, S. Harada et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVIII. 2014. Vol. 9050. Art. ID: 90500D. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2047374
19. Amplitude and spatial frequency characterization of line-edge roughness using CD-SEM / G. Eytan, O. Dror, L. Ithier et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVI. 2002. Vol. 4689. Art. ID: 473473. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.473473
20. Marschner T., Stief C. Characterization of 193-nm resist layers by CD-SEM sidewall imaging // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVII. 2003. Vol. 5038. Art. ID: 482808. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.482808
21. Nasu O., Sasada K., Ikeda M., Ezumi M. New CD-SEM system for 100-nm node process // Hitachi Review. 2002. Vol. 51. No. 4. P. 125–129.
22. Monahan K. M., MacNaughton C., Waiman Ng, Quattrini R. A systems approach to gate CD control: Metrology, throughput, and OEE // 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 97CH36023). San Francisco, CA: IEEE, 1997. P. B53–B57. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ISSM.1997.664510
23. Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices / N. G. Orji, M. Badaroglu, B. M. Barnes et al. // Nat. Electron. 2018. Vol. 1. No. 10. P. 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0150-9
24. Keller N., Liu Zh. Metrology solutions for gate-all-around transistors in high volume manufacturing // Semiconductor Digest Magazine. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 5. P. 24–28.
25. Binnig G., Quate C. F., Gerber Ch. Atomic force microscope // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986. Vol. 56. Iss. 9. P. 930–933. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930
26. Парфенов В. А., Юдин И. А. Атомно-силовая микроскопия и ее применения в науке, технике и реставрации // Изв. СПбГЭТУ «ЛЭТИ». 2015. № 9. С. 61–70. EDN UZCATX.
Parfenov V. A., Yudin I. A. Atomic force microscopy and its application in science, engineering and restoration. Izv. SPbGETU “LETI” = Proceedings of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University, 2015, no. 9, pp. 61–70. (In Russian).
27. Improved etch and CMP process control using in-line AFM / T. Trenkler, T. Kraiss, U. Mantz et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII. 2004. Vol. 5375. Art. ID: 535967. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535967
28. Трапашко Г. А. Калибровка установок измерений размеров элементов микроэлектронных структур // Наука и техника. 2012. № 4. С. 22–30. EDN TORETB.
Trapashko G. Calibration of devices for measuring elements of micro-electronic structures. Nauka i tekhnika = Science and Technique, 2012, no. 4, pp. 22–30. (In Russian).
29. Быков В. А. Микромеханика для сканирующей зондовой микроскопии и нанотехнологии // Микросистемная техника. 2000. № 1. С. 21–33. EDN HOHZFV.
Bykov V. A. Micromechanics for scanning probe microscopy and nanotechnology. Mikrosistemnaya tekhnika = Microsystems Engineering, 2000, no. 1, pp. 21–33. (In Russian).
30. Kado H., Yokoyama K., Tohda T. A novel ZnO whisker tip for atomic force microscopy // Ultramicroscopy. 1992. Vol. 42–44. P. 1659–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(92)90501-A
31. Kado H., Yamamoto Sh., Yokoyama K., Tohda T. Observation of contact holes by atomic force microscopy with a ZnO whisker tip // Journal of Applied Physics. 1993. Vol. 74. Iss. 7. P. 4354–4356. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355313
32. Advancement in fabrication of carbon nanotube tip for atomic force microscope using multi-axis nanomanipulator in scanning electron microscope / S. K. Kanth, A. Sharma, B. C. Park et al. // Nanotechnology. 2022. Vol. 33. No. 17. Art. No. 175703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac4a2b
33. New three-dimensional AFM for CD measurement and sidewall characterization / Y. Hua, C. Buenviaje-Coggins, Y. Lee et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV. 2011. Vol. 7971. Art. ID: 797118. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.879545
34. Introduction of next-generation 3D AFM for advanced process control / J. Foucher, R. Thérèse, Y. Lee et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVII. 2013. Vol. 8681. Art. ID: 868106. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2011463
35. Recent CD AFM probe developments for sub-45 nm technology nodes / H.-C. Liu, J. R. Osborne, G. A. Dahlen et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII. 2008. Vol. 6922. Art. ID: 69222J. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.773057
36. Chen X., Liu S. Optical scatterometry for nanostructure metrology // Metrology / ed. W. Gao. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2019. P. 477–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4938-5_17
37. Beklemishev N. N., Benevolenskii S. B., Istomina N. L., Kopylov P. V. Improvement of the accuracy of diffraction measurements of circuit feature sizes // Russ. Microelectron. 1998. Vol. 27. Iss. 6. P. 386–388.
38. Implementation of spectroscopic critical dimension (SCD) (TM) for gate CD control and stepper characterization / J. A. Allgair, D. C. Benoit, M. Drew (Jr.) et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XV. 2001. Vol. 4344. Art. ID: 436771. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.436771
39. Nondestructive analysis of lithographic patterns with natural line edge roughness from Mueller matrix ellipsometric data / X. Chen, Y. Shi, H. Jiang et al. // Applied Surface Science. 2016. Vol. 388. P. 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.167
40. Fast and accurate scatterometry metrology method for STI CMP step height process evaluation / C.-H. Lin, C. Huang, C.-L. Hsu et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVI. 2012. Vol. 8324. Art. ID: 832421. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.916235
41. High speed optical metrology solution for after etch process monitoring and control / A.-L. Charley, Ph. Leray, W. Pypen et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXVIII. 2014. Vol. 9050. Art. ID: 90501H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2047280
42. Metrology characterization of spacer double patterning by scatterometry / P. Dasari, J. Li, J. Hu et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV. 2011. Vol. 7971. Art. ID: 797111. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.879900
43. Advanced EUV resist characterization using scatterometry and machine learning / D. Schmidt, K. Petrillo, M. Breton et al. // 2021 32nd Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC). Milpitas, CA: IEEE, 2021. P. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC51741.2021.9435698
44. El Kodadi M., Soulan S., Besacier M., Schiavone P. Real time scatterometry for profile control during resist trimming process // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 2009. Vol. 27. Iss. 6. P. 3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3256594
45. Multiparameter grating metrology using optical scatterometry / Ch. J. Raymond, M. R. Murnane, S. L. Prins et al. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 1997. Vol. 15. Iss. 2. P. 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.589320
46. Buckner B. D., Hirleman E. D. Deep-ultraviolet scatterometry for nanoparticle detection // Proc. SPIE. Process Control and Diagnostics. 2000. Vol. 4182. Art. ID: 410083. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.410083
47. Ito Y., Higuchi A., Omote K. Characterization of cross-sectional profile of resist L/S and hole pattern using CD-SAXS // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX. 2016. Vol. 9778. Art. ID: 97780L. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2218983
48. Nonplanar high-k dielectric thickness measurements using CD-SAXS / C. Wang, K.-W. Choi, Y.-C. Chen et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXIII. 2009. Vol. 7272. Art. ID: 72722M. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.813757
49. Pattern fidelity in nanoimprinted films using CD-SAXS / R. L. Jones, Ch. L. Soles, E. K. Lin et al. // Proc. SPIE. Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX. 2005. Vol. 5751. Art. ID: 600267. https://doi.org/10.1117/ 12.600267
50. A holistic metrology approach: Hybrid metrology utilizing scatterometry, CD-AFM, and CD-SEM / A. Vaid, B. B. Yan, Y. T. Jiang et al. // Proc. SPIE. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV. 2011. Vol. 7971. Art. ID: 797103. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.881632