The conventional programs permit to simulate the CMOS-microchips considering the influence of cosmic rays in active elements. However, the usage of such programs in simulation of the microchips considering the influence of the Single Event Effects (SEE) is ineffective mainly because of complexity of equivalent schemes, which describe SEE. The description technique, offered by the authors, uses the П-type approximation of real ionization currents in p/n-junctions. It enables to set these currents as the initial data. The approximated values of currents are computed using TCAD Sentaurus for a standard set of elements and are stored as a library. In simulation of SEE in CMOS-microchips with the automatically generated topology, based on the functional library, two types of labels are used, which are assigned to the library elements (LE). The labels of the first type are assigned permanently to all LE during creation of the library. The labels of the second type are used during the microchip functional description. The approach, which has been considered, simplifies the work of the most frequently used synthesizers, which permits to manipulate the library elements. Such method simplifies the work of the most frequently used synthesizers, which permits to manipulate LE. The subjective factor in choosing the labels for LE is justified while searching for <<weak>> spots in the microchip structure and in evaluation of the CMOS-microchip reaction to SEE at those spots.
Литература
1. High-performance SPICE development including an analytical transient photocurrent BJT model / L. Waters, C. Axness, W. Beezhold et al. // Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque. – SAND2000 – 1999J.
2. Schwank J. Total dose effects in MOS devices // Radiation Effects – From Particles to Payloads. IEEE NSREC Short Course. – 2002. – P. 111–123.
3. Holms C.R., Poindexter E.H. The silicon-silicon-dioxide system: its microstructure and imperfections // Rep. Prog. Phys. – 1994. – №57. – P. 791–852.
4. Microscopic nature of border traps in MOS devices / W.L. Warren, M.R. Shaneyfelt, D.M. Fleetwood et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 1994. – Vol. 41. – N. 57. – P. 1817–1827.
5. Fleetwood D.M. Border traps in MOS devices // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 1992. – Vol. 39. – N. 2. – P. 169–271.
6. Dodd P.E., Massengill L.W. Basic mechanisms and modeling of single-event upset in digital microelectronics // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2003. – Vol. 50. – P. 583–602.
7. May T.C., Woods M.H. Alpha-particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories // IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. – 1979. – Vol. NS-26. – P. 2–9.
8. Impact of technology trends on SEU in CMOS SRAMs / P.E. Dodd, F.W. Sexton, G.L. Hash et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 1996. – V. NS-43. – N. 6. – P. 2797–2804.
9. Sexton F.W. Destructive single-event effects in semiconductor devices and ICs [Text] // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2003. – Vol. 50. – N. 3. – P. 603–621.
10. Evaluation of SEGR threshold in power MOSFETs / M. Allenspach, J.R. Brews, I. Mouret et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 1994. – Vol. 41. – P. 2160–2166.
11. Snap-back: a stable regenerative breakdown mode of MOS devices / A. Ochoa, F.W. Sexton,
T.F. Wrobel et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 1983. – Vol. 30. – P. 4127–4130.
12. Моделирование влияния ТЗЧ на работу СВЧ СФБ, изготовленных по КМОП-КНИ-технологии / Д.А. Атамась, Д.А. Копцев, А. В. Селецкий и др. // Электронная техника. Сер. 3. Микроэлектроника. – 2015. – Вып. 3 (159). – С. 60–66.
13. Никифоров А.Ю., Телец В.А., Чумаков А.И. Радиационные эффекты в КМОП ИС. – М.: Радио и связь. – 1994. – 164 с.
14. Simulation study on the effect of multiple node charge collection on error cross-section in CMOS sequential logic / M.C. Casey, A.R. Duncan, B.L. Bhuva et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2008. – Vol. 55. – N. 6. – P. 3136–3140.
15. Simultaneous single event charge sharing and parasitic bipolar conduction in a highly-scaled SRAM design / B.D. Olson, D.R. Ball, K.M. Warren et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2005. – Vol. 52. – N. 6. – P. 2132–2136.
16. Significance of strike model in circuit level prediction of charge sharing upsets / A.M. Francis,
D. Dimitrov, J.S. Kauppila et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2009. – Vol. 56. – N. 6. – P. 3109–3114.
17. Geometry-aware single-event enabled compact models for sub-50nm partially depleted silicon-on-insulator technologies / J.S. Kauppila, D.R. Ball, M.L. Alles et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2015. – Vol. 62. – N. 4. – P. 1589–1589.
18. Device-physics-based analytical model for single-event transients in SOI CMOS logic / D. Kobayashi, K. Hirose, V. Ferlet-Cavrois et al. // IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. – 2009. – Vol. 56. – N. 6. – P. 3043–3049.
19. Прогнозирование локальных радиационных эффектов в ИС при воздействии фак-торов космического пространства / А.И. Чумаков, А.Л. Васильев, А.А. Козлов и др. // Микроэлектроника. – 2010. – Т. 39. – №2. – С. 85–90.
20. Рембеза С.И., Кононов В.С. Влияние импульсных ионизирующих излучений на усилители выборки/хранения с КМОП-структурой и подложкой «кремний на изоляторе» // Вестник Воронежского государственного технического университета. – 2011. – Т. 7. – №3. – С. 47–49.
21. Baker R.J. CMOS: circuit design, layout and simulation // IEEE Press. – 2005. – 1039 p.